Case Studies / Testimonials
Case Study 1:
Significant Reduction of Selection Costs and Time, Improvement in Objectivity and Efficiency.
An industry leading organisation annually recruits quality graduates into its Graduate Program from reputable universities.
In addition to the attainment of solid academic results the organisation also seeks individuals whose strengths align with the organisations core values.
We developed an online competency assessment that focused on competency testing each candidate’s level of awareness of the actions required to deliver on the core values critical for the successful completion of the Graduate Program.
Case Study 2:
Improving Screening Consistency and Objectivity
The Pharmaceutical industry wanted to enhance their method of selecting winners of their prestigious annual excellence awards for Best Sales Representative, Best Sales Manager and Best Sales Team. We were chosen to develop an online customised assessment that measured the performance competencies the researchers within the industry had identified as critical for success in the respective roles.
Our first step in developing the customised assessment was to create numerous real world mini case studies and multiple choice responses for each of the core performance competencies. These were then verified by the pharmaceutical industry subject matter experts for their validity and entered onto our web based assessment architecture. Each contestant was sent a discrete Identification number and password that enabled him or her to access their personal competency assessment online. The resulting data from each competency assessment was incorporated into the judging forming part of the scoring of and ultimately the selection of the individual category winners.
“The online competency assessment added significant value to our judging process. The data that flowed from each contestant’s responses enabled the judging panel to delve in more depth into the respective individuals delivery of the industries core performance competencies. The content of the assessment was extremely relevant to the criteria and ensured consistency of judging across all candidates. In addition the assessment improved objectivity and greatly helped in creating a shortlist that ultimately led to the identification of the winners of each category.” - Malcolm Dawes Awards Judge.